unreachable_block.ll
1.46 KB
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
; RUN: llc -mtriple x86_64-- -stop-before peephole-opt -o %t.mir %s
; RUN: llc -mtriple x86_64-- -run-pass none %t.mir -verify-machineinstrs -o - | FileCheck %s
; Unreachable blocks in the machine instr representation are these
; weird empty blocks with no successors.
; The MIR printer used to not print empty lists of successors. However,
; the MIR parser now treats non-printed list of successors as "please
; guess it for me". As a result, the parser tries to guess the list of
; successors and given the block is empty, just assumes it falls through
; the next block.
;
; The following test case used to fail the verifier because the false
; path ended up falling through split.true and now, the definition of
; %v does not dominate all its uses.
; Indeed, we go from the following CFG:
; entry
; / \
; true (def) false
; |
; split.true (use)
;
; To this one:
; entry
; / \
; true (def) false
; | / <-- invalid edge
; split.true (use)
;
; Because of the invalid edge, we get the "def does not
; dominate all uses" error.
;
; CHECK-LABEL: name: foo
; CHECK-LABEL: bb.{{[0-9]+}}.false:
; CHECK-NEXT: successors:
; CHECK-NOT: %bb.{{[0-9]+}}.split.true
; CHECK-LABEL: bb.{{[0-9]+}}.split.true:
define void @foo(i32* %bar) {
br i1 undef, label %true, label %false
true:
%v = load i32, i32* %bar
br label %split.true
false:
unreachable
split.true:
%vInc = add i32 %v, 1
store i32 %vInc, i32* %bar
ret void
}