currentLimitation.ll
3.33 KB
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
; RUN: opt < %s -basicaa -loop-interchange -pass-remarks-missed='loop-interchange' \
; RUN: -pass-remarks-output=%t -verify-loop-info -verify-dom-info -S | FileCheck -check-prefix=IR %s
; RUN: FileCheck --input-file=%t %s
target datalayout = "e-m:e-i64:64-f80:128-n8:16:32:64-S128"
target triple = "x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu"
@A = common global [100 x [100 x i32]] zeroinitializer
@B = common global [100 x [100 x [100 x i32]]] zeroinitializer
@C = common global [100 x [100 x i64]] zeroinitializer
;;--------------------------------------Test case 01------------------------------------
;; [FIXME] This loop though valid is currently not interchanged due to the limitation that we cannot split the inner loop latch due to multiple use of inner induction
;; variable.(used to increment the loop counter and to access A[j+1][i+1]
;; for(int i=0;i<N-1;i++)
;; for(int j=1;j<N-1;j++)
;; A[j+1][i+1] = A[j+1][i+1] + k;
; FIXME: Currently fails because of DA changes.
; IR-LABEL: @interchange_01
; IR-NOT: split
; CHECK: Name: Dependence
; CHECK-NEXT: Function: interchange_01
define void @interchange_01(i32 %k, i32 %N) {
entry:
%sub = add nsw i32 %N, -1
%cmp26 = icmp sgt i32 %N, 1
br i1 %cmp26, label %for.cond1.preheader.lr.ph, label %for.end17
for.cond1.preheader.lr.ph:
%cmp324 = icmp sgt i32 %sub, 1
%0 = add i32 %N, -2
%1 = sext i32 %sub to i64
br label %for.cond1.preheader
for.cond.loopexit:
%cmp = icmp slt i64 %indvars.iv.next29, %1
br i1 %cmp, label %for.cond1.preheader, label %for.end17
for.cond1.preheader:
%indvars.iv28 = phi i64 [ 0, %for.cond1.preheader.lr.ph ], [ %indvars.iv.next29, %for.cond.loopexit ]
%indvars.iv.next29 = add nuw nsw i64 %indvars.iv28, 1
br i1 %cmp324, label %for.body4, label %for.cond.loopexit
for.body4:
%indvars.iv = phi i64 [ %indvars.iv.next, %for.body4 ], [ 1, %for.cond1.preheader ]
%indvars.iv.next = add nuw nsw i64 %indvars.iv, 1
%arrayidx7 = getelementptr inbounds [100 x [100 x i32]], [100 x [100 x i32]]* @A, i64 0, i64 %indvars.iv.next, i64 %indvars.iv.next29
%2 = load i32, i32* %arrayidx7
%add8 = add nsw i32 %2, %k
store i32 %add8, i32* %arrayidx7
%lftr.wideiv = trunc i64 %indvars.iv to i32
%exitcond = icmp eq i32 %lftr.wideiv, %0
br i1 %exitcond, label %for.cond.loopexit, label %for.body4
for.end17:
ret void
}
; When currently cannot interchange this loop, because transform currently
; expects the latches to be the exiting blocks too.
; IR-LABEL: @interchange_02
; IR-NOT: split
;
; CHECK: Name: ExitingNotLatch
; CHECK-NEXT: Function: interchange_02
define void @interchange_02(i64 %k, i64 %N) {
entry:
br label %for1.header
for1.header:
%j23 = phi i64 [ 0, %entry ], [ %j.next24, %for1.inc10 ]
br label %for2
for2:
%j = phi i64 [ %j.next, %latch ], [ 0, %for1.header ]
%arrayidx5 = getelementptr inbounds [100 x [100 x i64]], [100 x [100 x i64]]* @C, i64 0, i64 %j, i64 %j23
%lv = load i64, i64* %arrayidx5
%add = add nsw i64 %lv, %k
store i64 %add, i64* %arrayidx5
%exitcond = icmp eq i64 %j, 99
br i1 %exitcond, label %for1.inc10, label %latch
latch:
%j.next = add nuw nsw i64 %j, 1
br label %for2
for1.inc10:
%j.next24 = add nuw nsw i64 %j23, 1
%exitcond26 = icmp eq i64 %j23, 99
br i1 %exitcond26, label %for.end12, label %for1.header
for.end12:
ret void
}